|
Post by Drifter on Sept 12, 2018 15:56:05 GMT -5
GOP congressman says kids with gay parents would be better off in orphanages in rant to high school studentsIn audio obtained from a speech at a high school, a GOP congressman said orphanages would be preferable to gay adoption. The Los Angeles Blade reported that Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) made the comments during a speech at Colts Neck High School in Colts Neck, New Jersey on May 29. The recording obtained by the Blade begins with Colts Neck senior Hannah Valdes telling Smith that her gay sister may want to adopt in the future. She then asked the congressman if her sister would be “less of a legitimate parent” based on “household studies.” “The issue, legally, is moot at this point especially with the Supreme Court decision,” Smith said, but Valdes pressed on, asking the congressman about his personal beliefs on gay adoption. “There are many others who would like to adopt who can acquire a child,” the lawmaker responded, noting that “the waiting periods are extremely long.” Another student asked Smith what makes “others” better-suited to raising children. “In my opinion a child needs every possibility of —” the Republican said, cutting himself off. “Somebody mentioned orphanages before,” he continued. “I mean, orphanages are still a possibility for some kids.” Valdes told the Blade that earlier in assembly, “another student asked about one of Smith’s votes in 1999 in favor of an amendment that would have banned adoption by gay parents in D.C.” That student asked the congressman if he would still vote that way or if his opinion had changed — and Smith said he still holds that belief. “Rep. Smith responded by saying that he does not approve of gay adoption because gay households are not healthy environments for children to grow up in,” Valdes told the LGBTQ website. “He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” link
|
|
|
Post by highlandannie on Sept 13, 2018 8:29:06 GMT -5
FFS!
|
|
|
Post by nkat on Sept 13, 2018 9:42:52 GMT -5
What an idiot!
nkat
|
|
|
Post by The Inspector on Sept 13, 2018 10:25:18 GMT -5
I am sure these are religious studies.
I can find 'numerous studies' that say the world is flat?
The Real studies have no problems with gay adoption.
These people are out-there.
|
|
|
Post by tnthomas on Sept 13, 2018 11:13:04 GMT -5
An old saying comes to mind: "stupid is as stupid does".
|
|
|
Post by dragonlady on Sept 13, 2018 12:03:02 GMT -5
He's entitled to his opinion, but I feel he is dead wrong. "Loving parents" is not necessarily gender specific.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2018 12:36:35 GMT -5
I am sure these are religious studies. I can find 'numerous studies' that say the world is flat? The Real studies have no problems with gay adoption.
These people are out-there.
When I worked for the Florida Department of Transportation I became very familiar with "studies". Traffic Impact studies, Interchange Justification studies, Economic Impact studies, Cost benefit studies, etc. etc. You name it, we did em. Or we hired a "consultant" to do them.
In every single case the word came down from the politically connected powers that be as to what that study should say. Our job was then to produce a "study" that said that.
Now don't get me wrong here. You are not told this is any specific words. Instead your boss may just say something to the effect that "Senator so and so's office is very interested in this project" That's your que to make sure the study you have been tasked with justify's the project in question. In other cases, where you aren't provided any such direction up front you might find that if your preliminary draft doesn't say what the powers that be want to hear, your boss might call you into his office and suggest to you that you "revisit" or "take another look" at your "methodology and assumptions".
Once you understood those ground rules the job really wasn't that hard. You produce a "study" that says whatever the powers that be want it to say. The alternative being to commit career suicide.
I have no doubt that most if not all government agencies operate in a similar way.
|
|
|
Post by rebecca2013 on Sept 13, 2018 15:44:52 GMT -5
Well.... in my case I suppose I should have remained married to an abusive, violent, cheating man who physically and mentally abused me instead of being in the loving relationship I am currently in.... wow....Ziyi is a mom too.... even if she doesn't say so, she has cared for my kids just as if they were her own.... My kids love and respect her.... It seems so insane to worry about someone's sexual identity and raising children... Why would it matter?? It isn't like we recruit our children to be homosexual. People like that have tiny little minds and more and more are coming out of the woodwork since this idiot business man took control of this country.... The Religious Right have picketed our neighborhoods, they plaster posters in our area.... there is a fringe of lunatics who live close by who make homophobic people look like Mr. Rodgers.... they are insane and even said to "burn out those perverts" not even knowing ANY person or persons who are openly gay??? Just let's run through the area and anyone who "looks or acts gay" will have holy justice place on them...... Really??? seriously?? Sounds like a "witch hunt" to me
well fortunately no hate crimes have been actually carried out but who is to say it won't happen?? This country is being torn apart by feeble minds....
|
|
|
Post by oldmontana on Sept 13, 2018 15:52:24 GMT -5
CORRECTED: GOP lawmaker taken out of context in remarks on gay adoption thehill.com/homenews/house/406338-gop-congressman-orphanages-better-fThe Blade said it "stands behind its reporting." However, the audio clip that was circulated throughout the day on Wednesday was taken out of context . Smith, a longtime congressman whose views on LGBTQ rights have come under fire in the past, mentioned orphanages in response to a question about gay adoption from a students at Colts Neck High School in May, as first reported by the Washington Blade on Wednesday under the headline "GOP lawmaker caught on tape: Orphanages better than gay adoption." The Blade said it "stands behind its reporting." However, the audio clip that was circulated throughout the day on Wednesday was taken out of context. The full audio tape, released by Smith's campaign, reveals that Smith at another point said he does not believe orphanages are better than gay adoption. Smith replied "lord, no" when a constituent asked if he believes orphanages are a viable alternative. "And on adoption, adoption is all about the best interests of the child," Smith said. "Now there are people who feel the best interest of the child is for gay couples to adopt. I really believe that the best interests, you find a home where they are more likely — the home study that is done takes in all kinds of factors." "I would vote the same way, frankly, as I did then," Smith said, referring to his 1999 vote against gay adoption. =========================================== This from the original post.. “Rep. Smith responded by saying that he does not approve of gay adoption because gay households are not healthy environments for children to grow up in,” Valdes told the LGBTQ website. “He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” This I agree with.
|
|
|
Post by chinadoll1981 on Sept 13, 2018 16:26:15 GMT -5
CORRECTED: GOP lawmaker taken out of context in remarks on gay adoption thehill.com/homenews/house/406338-gop-congressman-orphanages-better-fThe Blade said it "stands behind its reporting." However, the audio clip that was circulated throughout the day on Wednesday was taken out of context . Smith, a longtime congressman whose views on LGBTQ rights have come under fire in the past, mentioned orphanages in response to a question about gay adoption from a students at Colts Neck High School in May, as first reported by the Washington Blade on Wednesday under the headline "GOP lawmaker caught on tape: Orphanages better than gay adoption." The Blade said it "stands behind its reporting." However, the audio clip that was circulated throughout the day on Wednesday was taken out of context. The full audio tape, released by Smith's campaign, reveals that Smith at another point said he does not believe orphanages are better than gay adoption. Smith replied "lord, no" when a constituent asked if he believes orphanages are a viable alternative. "And on adoption, adoption is all about the best interests of the child," Smith said. "Now there are people who feel the best interest of the child is for gay couples to adopt. I really believe that the best interests, you find a home where they are more likely — the home study that is done takes in all kinds of factors." "I would vote the same way, frankly, as I did then," Smith said, referring to his 1999 vote against gay adoption. =========================================== This from the original post.. “Rep. Smith responded by saying that he does not approve of gay adoption because gay households are not healthy environments for children to grow up in,” Valdes told the LGBTQ website. “He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” This I agree with.
“He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” really??? Well that makes no one bit of rational sense.... and seem like propaganda from evangelical right.... I am sorry but, that just isn't real.
To date, the consensus in the social science literature is clear: in the United States, children living with two same-sex parents fare, as well as children residing with two different-sex parents. Numerous credible and methodologically sound social science studies, including many drawing on nationally representative data, form the basis of this consensus. These studies reveal that children raised in same-sex parent families fare just, as well as children raised in different-sex parent families across a wide spectrum of child well-being measures: academic performance, cognitive development, social development, psychological health, early sexual activity, and substance abuse. From Child Well-Being in Same-Sex Parent Families: Review of Research Prepared for American Sociological Association Amicus Brief..
The sorry part is most of these people spout all this "research" but as a psychologist, I understand the role of homophobia and it's effect on exacerbating myths and fears.... Right leaning "research" would also tell you that Mexicans are a threat to all white people, that Canadians are evil and our enemies and all gay people are evil and wish to turn children into gay drones. Rational thinking people do not subscribe to such blatant lies but there are many today who believe such garbage.... Like PT Barnum say.... "There's a sucker born every minute" and the Foolish..... Person continues to divide and support such theories.... Maybe time for me to stay in Taiwan? I begin to think so....
|
|
|
Post by Drifter on Sept 13, 2018 17:22:38 GMT -5
“Rep. Smith responded by saying that he does not approve of gay adoption because gay households are not healthy environments for children to grow up in,” Valdes told the LGBTQ website. “He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” This I agree with. Then you are both suffering from homophobia.
|
|
|
Post by chinadoll1981 on Sept 13, 2018 17:29:57 GMT -5
“Rep. Smith responded by saying that he does not approve of gay adoption because gay households are not healthy environments for children to grow up in,” Valdes told the LGBTQ website. “He then stated that ‘numerous household studies’ show that children that have heterosexual parents have better lives than children that have homosexual parents.” This I agree with. Then you are both suffering from homophobia.
|
|
|
Post by Warrigal on Sept 14, 2018 3:49:49 GMT -5
I don't think my grandmother, who died the year before I was born, would agree the congressman. Apparently one of her sayings was that all children needed was a warm dry bed and lots of love.
I think she was onto something profound.
|
|
|
Post by highlandannie on Sept 14, 2018 5:28:20 GMT -5
Well.... in my case I suppose I should have remained married to an abusive, violent, cheating man who physically and mentally abused me instead of being in the loving relationship I am currently in.... wow....Ziyi is a mom too.... even if she doesn't say so, she has cared for my kids just as if they were her own.... My kids love and respect her.... It seems so insane to worry about someone's sexual identity and raising children... Why would it matter?? It isn't like we recruit our children to be homosexual. People like that have tiny little minds and more and more are coming out of the woodwork since this idiot business man took control of this country.... The Religious Right have picketed our neighborhoods, they plaster posters in our area.... there is a fringe of lunatics who live close by who make homophobic people look like Mr. Rodgers.... they are insane and even said to "burn out those perverts" not even knowing ANY person or persons who are openly gay??? Just let's run through the area and anyone who "looks or acts gay" will have holy justice place on them...... Really??? seriously?? Sounds like a "witch hunt" to me
well fortunately no hate crimes have been actually carried out but who is to say it won't happen?? This country is being torn apart by feeble minds.... It's obvious you two are amazing parents! Funny thing is the vast majority of gay and lesbian adults were raised by STRAIGHT parents! So the logic is out the window.
|
|
|
Post by rebecca2013 on Sept 14, 2018 5:37:53 GMT -5
Well.... in my case I suppose I should have remained married to an abusive, violent, cheating man who physically and mentally abused me instead of being in the loving relationship I am currently in.... wow....Ziyi is a mom too.... even if she doesn't say so, she has cared for my kids just as if they were her own.... My kids love and respect her.... It seems so insane to worry about someone's sexual identity and raising children... Why would it matter?? It isn't like we recruit our children to be homosexual. People like that have tiny little minds and more and more are coming out of the woodwork since this idiot business man took control of this country.... The Religious Right have picketed our neighborhoods, they plaster posters in our area.... there is a fringe of lunatics who live close by who make homophobic people look like Mr. Rodgers.... they are insane and even said to "burn out those perverts" not even knowing ANY person or persons who are openly gay??? Just let's run through the area and anyone who "looks or acts gay" will have holy justice place on them...... Really??? seriously?? Sounds like a "witch hunt" to me
well fortunately no hate crimes have been actually carried out but who is to say it won't happen?? This country is being torn apart by feeble minds.... It's obvious you two are amazing parents! Funny thing is the vast majority of gay and lesbian adults were raised by STRAIGHT parents! So the logic is based out the window. Sometimes people just judge without knowing anything just based on fear and irrational belief
|
|