Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2018 16:56:17 GMT -5
TobyTyler your argument does not hold water so you attack the other posters.
Bush got the Info, he wanted and worked at painting people who were against the war as weak and unpatriotic.
It is not easy to stop a president that wants a war.
Rebecca attacked me first.
And as for my argument that our Intelligence community lies to the people that pretty obvious. They've been doing it for a long long time.
But once again, as per usual the members of this forum brand me as the bad guy.
|
|
|
Post by chinadoll1981 on Sept 5, 2018 17:11:10 GMT -5
TobyTyler your argument does not hold water so you attack the other posters.
Bush got the Info, he wanted and worked at painting people who were against the war as weak and unpatriotic.
It is not easy to stop a president that wants a war.
Rebecca attacked me first.
And as for my argument that our Intelligence community lies to the people that pretty obvious. They've been doing it for a long long time.
But once again, as per usual the members of this forum brand me as the bad guy.
Attack?!?!?? Really???? come now.... that was no attack..... WWBD??? What would Bernie Do??
|
|
|
Post by Warrigal on Sept 5, 2018 19:37:46 GMT -5
Do you have any idea how juvenile this sounds?
|
|
|
Post by helen on Sept 5, 2018 21:15:36 GMT -5
"But, Moooooooom, she started it."
|
|
|
Post by The Inspector on Sept 5, 2018 22:52:59 GMT -5
You have wondrous way of charming us with caring banter NOT
|
|
|
Post by The Inspector on Sept 5, 2018 23:19:43 GMT -5
Bush was very good at raising the flag, to get in to a war.
|
|
|
Post by 2old on Sept 6, 2018 6:32:26 GMT -5
TobyTyler your argument does not hold water so you attack the other posters.
Bush got the Info, he wanted and worked at painting people who were against the war as weak and unpatriotic.
It is not easy to stop a president that wants a war.
yeah, I remember Bush painting the French negatively because they didn't buy the BS. Remember " freedom fries"? IIRC, the "freedom fries" was coined by Bill O'Reilly on Fox News. O'Reilly, along with Hannity and others on Fox, used "embolden the enemy" every time someone spoke out against Bush and the Iraq War. I know Bush couldn't have spelled "embolden" and probably not have spelled even "freedom fries"! Bush and Trump could both be classified as "dumber than a stump". Those two were the idols of Fox News and their audience. The more intelligent leaders... Obama, etc... were denigrated by Fox. Isn't that an excellent view of the Fox News audience? Be fearful of those with intelligence that exceeds a 5th grade level because they are smarter than my 12 year old wife......
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 8:36:22 GMT -5
You have wondrous way of charming us with caring banter NOT
This forum is for Democratic Party lemmings. There is zero tolerance for the views of a Socialist such as myself.
|
|
|
Post by The Inspector on Sept 6, 2018 10:33:42 GMT -5
You come across as a very trump like Socialist?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 13:43:08 GMT -5
You come across as a very trump like Socialist? Bernie was my first choice for President.
Trump was second. Why? Because Trump will help bring about the revolution.
With Hillary Clinton there would be no revolution. Just more of the same sh*t, different day.
|
|
|
Post by tnthomas on Sept 6, 2018 15:13:51 GMT -5
You come across as a very trump like Socialist? Bernie was my first choice for President. Trump was second. Why? Because Trump will help bring about the revolution. With Hillary Clinton there would be no revolution. Just more of the same sh*t, different day. Actually, I can kind of see the logic in that...bringing the whole place crashing into rubble...to fix it.
Well, no doubt the future be looking up to better times because the nation's at rock bottom now.
|
|
|
Post by Warrigal on Sept 6, 2018 15:51:07 GMT -5
Bernie was my first choice for President.
Trump was second. Why? Because Trump will help bring about the revolution.
With Hillary Clinton there would be no revolution. Just more of the same sh*t, different day.
Revolutions do not always produce the desired outcomes. Once started they can easily be hijacked. Evolution over time is a much better way to bring about effective and beneficial change. Consider the two Russian revolutions of 1917. Compare this history with the British revolution, not the Civil War 0f 1625, but the later, slower social changes that took place during the Industrial Revolution period by act of parliament. In the former, the Romanovs were removed and later murdered but the people simply exchanged one form of oppression for another. In the British case, government continued as usual but the rights and benefits of the population continued to grow, without mass bloodshed.
Australia is another example of a quasi socialist society that has arrived without the need of revolutionary change.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2018 17:45:42 GMT -5
Bernie was my first choice for President.
Trump was second. Why? Because Trump will help bring about the revolution.
With Hillary Clinton there would be no revolution. Just more of the same sh*t, different day.
Revolutions do not always produce the desired outcomes. Once started they can easily be hijacked. Evolution over time is a much better way to bring about effective and beneficial change. Consider the two Russian revolutions of 1917. Compare this history with the British revolution, not the Civil War 0f 1625, but the later, slower social changes that took place during the Industrial Revolution period by act of parliament. In the former, the Romanovs were removed and later murdered but the people simply exchanged one form of oppression for another. In the British case, government continued as usual but the rights and benefits of the population continued to grow, without mass bloodshed.
Australia is another example of a quasi socialist society that has arrived without the need of revolutionary change.
You're awful haughty for someone from a country whose founders were a bunch of criminals.
|
|
|
Post by chinadoll1981 on Sept 6, 2018 18:33:47 GMT -5
You have wondrous way of charming us with caring banter NOT
This forum is for Democratic Party lemmings. There is zero tolerance for the views of a Socialist such as myself. I not think that true.... I think sometime you may get upset when your view appears to lean towards Trumpian theories and someone makes comment.... I not consider self as a blind follower of party... there are many Democrats who are corrupt too.... The only reason I focus on Trump is that from the very start, I disliked his policies, lies, exaggerations, moral conduct, basically I do not respect him and I have decided... he just in office.... a place-holder until we get a legitimate president, not this hack tv reality star.....
|
|
|
Post by Warrigal on Sept 6, 2018 19:47:26 GMT -5
Revolutions do not always produce the desired outcomes. Once started they can easily be hijacked. Evolution over time is a much better way to bring about effective and beneficial change. Consider the two Russian revolutions of 1917. Compare this history with the British revolution, not the Civil War 0f 1625, but the later, slower social changes that took place during the Industrial Revolution period by act of parliament. In the former, the Romanovs were removed and later murdered but the people simply exchanged one form of oppression for another. In the British case, government continued as usual but the rights and benefits of the population continued to grow, without mass bloodshed.
Australia is another example of a quasi socialist society that has arrived without the need of revolutionary change.
You're awful haughty for someone from a country whose founders were a bunch of criminals. Haughty? For expressing some thoughts on the outcomes of revolutionary versus evolutionary change?
'Tis you Sir, who shows distainful scorn for the opinions of others, not I.
|
|