|
Post by keith on Apr 23, 2018 22:46:47 GMT -5
A refreshing change...
You'd prefer Trump to Obama. Is that right? Why? Intelligent, eloquent,and compassionate versus ignorant, barely literate, and totally egoistic...this is your choice? I realize there would be ideological differences that could affect your choice under normal circumstance but...Trumpism isn't an ideology. I doubt if he has any definable ideology.
|
|
|
Post by TheSource on Apr 24, 2018 13:27:16 GMT -5
with all due respect.. I don't for one minute believe you have any "front line" perspective and knowledge.. I believe you are operating solely on preconceived notions about poor people and crap being fed to you from FOX and other Right Wing garbage sites... My dear lady, it's obvious that you see only want you want to see and believe only what you want to believe with respect to the abuse of the welfare system. It does not offend me if you don't believe me.
I don't need 'Faux News' and the other 'right wing garbage sites' to get information from when I witness the abuse first hand. It's also quite obvious that no amount of personal first hand experience that I can impart will alter your thinking and change your preconceived notions about said abuse.
Respectfully, you can spout and tout all the stats you want about abuse within the welfare system by pencil pushing morons that haven't a clue as to how the "real world" works 'cause they're all too cross-eyed from staring at computer screens instead of taking off the rose colored glasses to see what is actually happening.
I hear it all too often the rhetoric by "some" near the end of the month when the money runs out and that very same "some" can't even afford to purchase something decent for dinner for their family 'cause they just had to get their nails done and buy some new kicks or spandex leggings to go with their real leather jackets to compliment their sixty dollar 'do's which they think looks real nice flapping in the breeze while driving their luxury cars or SUV's 'round town all the while shootin' the breeze on those fancy phones that ain't of the 'Obama' kind.
I'm not saying to eliminate the system all together, but rather I am in support of a long overdue and drastic overhaul of it. Certain items should be deemed 'luxury' items if they provide little to no nutritional value. (ie: soda pop, potato chips, candy, etc.)
|
|
|
Post by nkat on Apr 24, 2018 15:02:51 GMT -5
But, but how could they afford all that on a welfare check?
NKat
|
|
|
Post by QuickSilver on Apr 24, 2018 15:48:14 GMT -5
with all due respect.. I don't for one minute believe you have any "front line" perspective and knowledge.. I believe you are operating solely on preconceived notions about poor people and crap being fed to you from FOX and other Right Wing garbage sites... My dear lady, it's obvious that you see only want you want to see and believe only what you want to believe with respect to the abuse of the welfare system. It does not offend me if you don't believe me.
I don't need 'Faux News' and the other 'right wing garbage sites' to get information from when I witness the abuse first hand. It's also quite obvious that no amount of personal first hand experience that I can impart will alter your thinking and change your preconceived notions about said abuse.
Respectfully, you can spout and tout all the stats you want about abuse within the welfare system by pencil pushing morons that haven't a clue as to how the "real world" works 'cause they're all too cross-eyed from staring at computer screens instead of taking off the rose colored glasses to see what is actually happening.
I hear it all too often the rhetoric by "some" near the end of the month when the money runs out and that very same "some" can't even afford to purchase something decent for dinner for their family 'cause they just had to get their nails done and buy some new kicks or spandex leggings to go with their real leather jackets to compliment their sixty dollar 'do's which they think looks real nice flapping in the breeze while driving their luxury cars or SUV's 'round town all the while shootin' the breeze on those fancy phones that ain't of the 'Obama' kind.
I'm not saying to eliminate the system all together, but rather I am in support of a long overdue and drastic overhaul of it. Certain items should be deemed 'luxury' items if they provide little to no nutritional value. (ie: soda pop, potato chips, candy, etc.) You still fail to tell us exactly WHAT "first hand " "Real world" experience you have that has shown you all this "fraud" you claim is happening.
|
|
|
Post by tnthomas on Apr 24, 2018 16:33:02 GMT -5
I hear it all too often the rhetoric by "some" near the end of the month when the money runs out and that very same "some" can't even afford to purchase something decent for dinner for their family 'cause they just had to get their nails done and buy some new kicks or spandex leggings to go with their real leather jackets to compliment their sixty dollar 'do's which they think looks real nice flapping in the breeze while driving their luxury cars or SUV's 'round town all the while shootin' the breeze on those fancy phones that ain't of the 'Obama' kind. I'm not saying to eliminate the system all together, but rather I am in support of a long overdue and drastic overhaul of it. Certain items should be deemed 'luxury' items if they provide little to no nutritional value. (ie: soda pop, potato chips, candy, etc.) Maybe what people need is some basic "how to" consumer education to counteract the constant bombardment of advertising and pop culture that extols the desirability of flashy. trashy and excess.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2018 17:04:15 GMT -5
My dear lady, it's obvious that you see only want you want to see and believe only what you want to believe with respect to the abuse of the welfare system. It does not offend me if you don't believe me.
I don't need 'Faux News' and the other 'right wing garbage sites' to get information from when I witness the abuse first hand. It's also quite obvious that no amount of personal first hand experience that I can impart will alter your thinking and change your preconceived notions about said abuse.
Respectfully, you can spout and tout all the stats you want about abuse within the welfare system by pencil pushing morons that haven't a clue as to how the "real world" works 'cause they're all too cross-eyed from staring at computer screens instead of taking off the rose colored glasses to see what is actually happening.
I hear it all too often the rhetoric by "some" near the end of the month when the money runs out and that very same "some" can't even afford to purchase something decent for dinner for their family 'cause they just had to get their nails done and buy some new kicks or spandex leggings to go with their real leather jackets to compliment their sixty dollar 'do's which they think looks real nice flapping in the breeze while driving their luxury cars or SUV's 'round town all the while shootin' the breeze on those fancy phones that ain't of the 'Obama' kind.
I'm not saying to eliminate the system all together, but rather I am in support of a long overdue and drastic overhaul of it. Certain items should be deemed 'luxury' items if they provide little to no nutritional value. (ie: soda pop, potato chips, candy, etc.) You still fail to tell us exactly WHAT "first hand " "Real world" experience you have that has shown you all this "fraud" you claim is happening. You're not the only one that noticed that he dodged that question.
|
|