|
Post by The Inspector on Feb 19, 2024 0:38:57 GMT -5
It's worth revisiting the indictments that Smith filed against Trump last summer. While journalists tend to call this the "January 6" case, the indicting document refers to a conspiracy that stretched from "November 14, 2020 through on or about January 20, 2021." The evidence is extensive, but only a fraction of it involves the efforts to bring followers to the Capitol to be foot soldiers in the insurrection. Mostly it's about the various efforts to persuade officials on all levels of government to certify fraudulent electors in the place of the real ones, or to fabricate enough votes for Trump to throw the election, or to get the Justice Department to declare the election fraudulent as a pretext to throw out the results. It's only when all that failed that Trump turned to violence to create the chaos that Chesebro and his associates thought could be used as cover to declare Trump the victor.
The new Chesebro documents are a strong reminder that the plot to steal the election really hinged on whether the Supreme Court would, as Trump hoped, use the Trump-created chaos as an excuse to simply declare the election null and claim Trump can retain power indefinitely. There's some reason to believe the justices, like Pence, wouldn't have played along it if came to that, because they knocked down Trump's other lawsuits asking for the courts to nullify the election.
The media is not very good at giving us, all the news!
|
|
|
Post by notbob on Feb 19, 2024 10:37:06 GMT -5
The media is not very good at giving us, all the news!
I agree, but if the media gave us "all the news," people would glaze over and change the channel, change the station, look to another internet site, or read another newspaper. I think it's wrong to blame the media in light of the fact that in general, they must rely on ratings or sales in order to survive. That's the way it works in a capitalist society. Most people don't have time to absorb all the nuances of in-depth reporting. I have the time, but I'm a very slow reader with poor comprehension, so I miss a lot of the in-depth reporting. It's not so much that the information isn't out there. One can find good, in-depth reporting if one takes the time to look for it, but most people just don't look that deeply to find as much information as possible. I plead my excuses, but I'm guilty of it too. That said, I learn from posts like this, from researching for specific things when arguing with people on the other side, and looking deeper when I hear of something on the news that particularly interests me.
|
|